Continuing to cut costs and drive out complexity in all aspects of operations Increasing the rate of product renewal based on consumer insight Increasing our investment in marketing, and building the Electrolux brand as the global leader in our industry. It was strategic because Electrolux had a choice of concentrating in.

Key Takeaways Key Points • Strategic management is the process of building capabilities that allow a firm to create value for customers, shareholders, and society while operating in competitive markets. • Strategy entails: specifying the organization ‘s mission, vision, and objectives; developing policies and plans to execute the vision; and allocating resources to implement those policies and plans. • Strategy is largely about using internal assets to create a value-added proposition. This helps to capture opportunities in the competitive environment while avoiding threats. • Experts in the field of strategy define the potential components of strategy and the different forms strategy can take. Key Terms • strategic management: The art and science of formulating, implementing, and evaluating cross-functional decisions that will enable an organization to achieve its objectives.

• balanced scorecard: A strategic performance management tool used by managers to track the execution of activities within their control and monitor the consequences of these actions. • strategy: A plan of action intended to accomplish a specific goal. Strategy involves the action plan of a company for building competitive advantage and increasing its triple bottom line over the long-term. The action plan relates to achieving the economic, social, and environmental performance objectives; in essence, it helps bridge the gap between the long-term vision and short-term decisions. Strategic Management Strategic management is the process of building capabilities that allow a firm to create value for customers, shareholders, and society while operating in competitive markets (Nag, Hambrick & Chen 2006).

It entails the analysis of internal and external environments of firms to maximize the use of resources in relation to objectives (Bracker 1980). Strategic management can depend upon the size of an organization and the proclivity to change the organization’s business environment.

The process of strategic management entails: • Specifying the organization’s mission, vision, and objectives • Developing policies and plans that are designed to achieve these objectives • Allocating resources to implement these policies and plans As an example, let’s take a company that wants to expand its current operations to producing widgets. The company’s strategy may involve analyzing the widget industry along with other businesses producing widgets. Through this analysis, the company can develop a goal for how to enter the market while differentiating from competitors’ products. It could then establish a plan to determine if the approach is successful. Keeping Score A balanced scorecard is a tool sometimes used to evaluate a business’s overall performance. From the executive level, the primary starting point will be stakeholder needs and expectations (i.e., financiers, customers, owners, etc.).

Following this, inputs such as objectives, operations, and internal processes will be developed to achieve these expectations. Another way to keep score of a strategy is to visualize it using a strategy map. Strategy maps help to illustrate how various goals are linked and provide trajectories for achieving these goals. Strategy map: This image is an example of a strategy map for a public-sector organization. It shows how various goals are linked and providing trajectories for achieving these goals.

Common Approaches to Strategy Richard Rumelt In 2011, Professor Richard P. Rumelt described strategy as a type of problem solving. He outlined a perspective on the components of strategy, which include: • Diagnosis: What is the problem being addressed? How do the mission and objectives imply action?

• Guiding Policy: What framework will be used to approach the operations? (This, in many ways, should be the decision of a given competitive advantage relative to the competition.) • Action Plans: What will the operations look like (in detail)? How will the processes be enacted to align with the guiding policy and address the issue in the diagnosis? Michael Porter In 1980, Michael Porter wrote that formulation of competitive strategy includes the consideration of four key elements: • Company strengths and weaknesses • Personal values of the key implementers (i.e., management or the board) • Industry opportunities and threats • Broader societal expectations Henry Mintzberg Henry Mintzberg stated that there are prescriptive approaches (what should be) and descriptive approaches (what is) to strategic management. Prescriptive schools are “one size fits all” approaches that designate best practices, while descriptive schools describe how strategy is implemented in specific contexts. No single strategic managerial method dominates, and the choice between managerial styles remains a subjective and context-dependent process.

Key Takeaways Key Points • Strategic management seeks to coordinate and integrate the activities of the various functional areas of a business in order to achieve long-term organizational objectives. • The initial task in strategic management is typically the compilation and dissemination of the vision and the mission statement. This outlines, in essence, the purpose of an organization.

• Strategies are usually derived by the top executives of the company and presented to the board of directors in order to ensure they are in line with the expectations of the stakeholders. • The implications of the selected strategy are highly important. These are illustrated through achieving high levels of strategic alignment and consistency relative to both the external and internal environment. • All strategic planning deals with at least one of three key questions: “ What do we do?” “ For whom do we do it?” and “ How do we excel?” In business strategic planning, the third question refers more to beating or avoiding competition. Key Terms • board of directors: A group of people elected by stockholders to establish corporate policies and make managerial decisions. • mission statement: A declaration of the overall goal or purpose of an organization. Strategic management is critical to the development and expansion of all organizations.

It represents the science of crafting and formulating short-term and long-term initiatives directed at optimally achieving organizational objectives. Strategy is inherently linked to a company’s mission statement and vision; these elements constitute the core concepts that allow a company to execute its goals. The company strategy must constantly be edited and improved to move in conjunction with the demands of the external environment. Strategy and Management As a result of its importance to the business or company, strategy is generally perceived as the highest level of managerial responsibility. Strategies are usually derived by the top executives of the company and presented to the board of directors in order to ensure they are in line with the expectations of company stakeholders. This is particularly true in public companies, where profitability and maximizing shareholder value are the company’s central mission. The implications of the selected strategy are also highly important.

These are illustrated through achieving high levels of strategic alignment and consistency relative to both the external and internal environment. In this way, strategy enables the company to maximize internal efficiency while capturing the highest potential of opportunities in the external environment. Key Strategic Questions The initial task in strategic management is to compile and disseminate the organization’s vision and mission statement. These outline, in essence, the purpose of the organization. Additionally, they specify the organization’s scope of activities. Strategic planning is the formal consideration of an organization’s future course, and all strategic planning deals with at least one of three key questions: • What do we do?

• How do we do it? • How do we excel? In business-related strategic planning, the third question refers more to beating or avoiding competition. Strategic management is the art, science, and craft of formulating, implementing, and evaluating cross-functional decisions that will enable an organization to achieve its long-term objectives. It involves specifying the organization’s mission, vision, and objectives; developing policies and plans to achieve these objectives; and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans. Strategic management seeks to coordinate and integrate the activities of a company’s various functional areas in order to achieve long-term organizational objectives.

Key Takeaways Key Points • Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington suggest evaluating strategic options based on three key criteria: suitability, feasibility, and acceptability. • Suitability refers to the overall rationale of the strategy and its fit with the organization ‘s mission. • Feasibility refers to whether or not the organization has the resources necessary to implement the strategy. • Acceptability is concerned with stakeholder expectations and the expected outcomes of implementing the strategy. • Will Mulcaster provides an additional 11 strategic forces which may impact the effectiveness of a given strategy. Key Terms • strategy: A plan of action intended to accomplish a specific goal.

• effectiveness: The capability of producing a desired result. Effectiveness is the capability to produce a desired result. Strategy is considered effective when short-term and long-term objectives are accomplished and are in line with the mission, vision, and stakeholder expectations. This requires upper management to recognize how each organizational component combines to create a competitive operational process. Suitability, Feasibility, and Acceptability With the above framework in mind, a number of academics have proposed perspectives on strategic effectiveness. Johnson, Scholes, and Whittington suggest evaluating the potential success of a strategy based on three criteria: • Suitability deals with the overall rationale of the strategy. One method of assessing suitability is using a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) analysis.

A suitable strategy fits the organization’s mission, reflects the organization’s capabilities, and captures opportunities in the external environment while avoiding threats. A suitable strategy should derive competitive advantage(s). • Feasibility is concerned with whether or not the organization has the resources required to implement the strategy (such as capital, people, time, market access, and expertise). One method of analyzing feasibility is to conduct a break-even analysis, which identifies if there are inputs to generate outputs and consumer demand to cover the costs involved. • Acceptability is concerned with the expectations of stakeholders (such as shareholders, employees, and customers) and any expected financial and non-financial outcomes. It is important for stakeholders to accept the strategy based on the risk (such as the probability of consequences) and the potential returns (such as benefits to stakeholders).

Employees are particularly likely to have concerns about non-financial issues such as working conditions and outsourcing. One method of assessing acceptability is through a what-if analysis, identifying best and worst case scenarios. SWOT Analysis: Here is an example of the SWOT analysis matrix. Mulcaster’s Managing Forces Framework Will Mulcaster argued that while research has been devoted to generating alternative strategies, not enough attention has been paid to the conditions that influence the effectiveness of strategies and strategic decision -making. For instance, it can be seen in retrospect that the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 could have been avoided if banks had paid more attention to the risky nature of their investments.

However, knowing in hindsight cannot address how banks should change the ways they make future decisions. Mulcaster’s Managing Forces Framework addresses this issue by identifying 11 forces that should be taken into account when making strategic decisions and implementing strategies: • Time • Opposing forces • Politics • Perception • Holistic effects • Adding value • Incentives • Learning capabilities • Opportunity cost • Risk • Style While this is quite a bit to consider, the key is to be as circumspect as possible when analyzing a given strategy. In many ways it is similar to the potential issues a scientist faces. A scientist must always be objective and conduct experiments without a bias toward a specific outcome. Scientists don’t prove something to be true; they test hypotheses. Download Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition Iso 64bit.

Similarly, strategists must not create a strategy to get to an end point; they must instead create a series of likely endpoints based on organizational inputs and operational approaches. Uncertainty is key, allowing strategic improvement for higher efficacy. Example A firm may perform a break-even analysis to determine if a strategy is feasible. The break-even point (BEP) is the point at which costs or expenses and revenue are equal: there is no net loss or gain, so the company has “broken even.” For example, if a business sells fewer than 200 tables each month, it will make a loss; if it sells more, it will make a profit. With this information, managers could determine if they expected to be able to make and sell 200 tables per month and then implement a strategy that is in accordance with their projections.

Key Takeaways Key Points • Size is highly relevant to organizational strategy and structure, and understanding the influencing factors is important for management to elect optimal strategic plans. • A global or transnational organization may employ a more structured strategic management model due to its size, scope of operations, and need to encompass stakeholder views and requirements. • A small or medium enterprise may employ an entrepreneurial approach due to its comparatively smaller size and scope of operations and its limited access to resources. • Smaller firms also tend to focus more on differentiation due to an inability to achieve scale economies. Similarly, larger firms tend to have more cost-sensitive strategic capabilities. • No single strategic managerial method dominates, and the choice of managerial style remains a subjective and context-dependent process. Key Terms • entrepreneurial: Having the spirit, attitude or qualities of a person who organizes and operates a business venture.

• structured interview: A quantitative research method commonly employed in survey research where each potential employee is asked the same questions in the same order. • structured: The state of being organized. Strategic management can depend on the size of an organization and the proclivity of change in its business environment.

In the U.S., an SME (small and medium enterprise) refers to an organization with 500 employees or less, while an MNE (multinational enterprise) refers to a global organization with a much larger operational scope. Size is highly relevant to organizational strategy and structure, and understanding the influencing factors is important for management to elect optimal strategic plans. Strategic Management in Large Organizations MNEs (multinational enterprises) may employ a more structured strategic management model due to its size, scope of operations, and need to encompass stakeholder views and requirements. MNEs are tasked with aligning complex and often dramatically different processes, demographic considerations, employees, legal systems, and stakeholders. Due to the wide variance and high volume of business, upper management needs stringent control systems embedded in the managerial strategy to enable predictability and conformity to mission, vision, and values.

For example, McDonald’s operates restaurants all over the globe. They have different menus in China than in France due to differing consumer tastes. They also have different hiring standards, regulations, and sourcing methods.

How does management create a strategy that doesn’t confine these geographic regions (and lose localization ) yet still maintains each region’s alignment with the mission, vision, and branding of McDonald’s? Low-cost Strategy Ideally, McDonald’s can construct careful strategic models and systems which control the critical components of the operations without hindering the localization.

From a strategic point of view, this involves creating a system of quality control, reporting, and localization that maintains the competitive advantage of scale economies and strong branding. Large firms such as McDonald’s often achieve better scale economies and thus can pursue low-cost strategies. This requires enormous managerial competency with meticulously crafted strategies at various levels in the organization (including corporate, functional, and regional). Strategic Management in Small Firms SMEs (small and medium enterprises) may employ an entrepreneurial approach due to its comparatively smaller size and scope of operations and limited access to resources. A smaller organization needs to be agile, adaptable, and flexible enough to develop new strengths and capture niche opportunities within a competitive industry with bigger players.

This requires fluidity in strategy while simultaneously maintaining a predetermined vision and mission statement. Achieving this requires a great deal of balance; it often requires a strategy that is created to enable multiple paths to the same objectives. Small firm strategies often incorporate flexibility to capture new opportunities as they arise, as opposed to maintaining an already well-established competitive advantage. Differentiation In most cases, low-cost strategies require substantial economies of scale.

Because of this constraint, smaller firms most often use differentiation strategies that focus on innovation over efficiency. Enabling creativity and innovation is strategically difficult to do as it requires a hands-off approach that empowers autonomy over structure. Innovate ideas are primarily trial and error, and so instilling creativity into a strategic process is also a high-risk approach.

Key Takeaways Key Points • Strategic management is the managerial responsibility to achieve competitive advantage through optimizing internal resources while capturing external opportunities and avoiding external threats. • While different businesses have different internal conditions, it is easiest to view these potential attributes as generalized categories. A value chain is a common tool used to accomplish this. • A value chain identifies the supporting activities (employee skills, technology, infrastructure, etc.) and the primary activities (acquiring inputs, operations, distribution, sales, etc.) that can potentially create profit.

• The external environment is even more diverse and complex than the internal environment, and there are many effective models to discuss, measure, and analyze it (i.e., Porter’s Five Force, SWOT Analysis, PESTEL framework, etc.). • With both the internal value chain and external environment in mind, upper management can reasonably derive a set of strategic principles which internally leverage strengths and externally capture opportunities to create profits. Key Terms • analysis: The process of breaking down a substance into its constituent parts, or the result of this process. Strategic management is the managerial responsibility to achieve competitive advantage through optimizing internal resources while capturing external opportunities and avoiding external threats. This requires carefully crafting a structure, series of objectives, mission, vision, and operational plan.

Recognizing the way in which internally developed organizational attributes will interact with the external competitive environment is central to successfully implementing a given strategy —and thus creating profitability. Internal Conditions The internal conditions are many and varied depending on the organization (just as the external factors in any given industry will be). However, management has some strategic control over how these various internal conditions interact. The achievement of synergy in this process derives competitive advantage. While different businesses have different internal conditions, it is easiest to view these potential attributes as generalized categories. A value chain is a common tool used to identify each moving part. It is a useful mind map for management to fill in during the derivation of internal strengths and weakness.

A value chain includes supports activities and primary activities, each with its own components. Michael Porter’s value chain: This model, created by Michael Porter, demonstrates how support and primary activities add up to potential margins (and potential competitive advantage). Support activities include HR management and technology; primary activities include operations, marketing and sales, and service.

External Opportunities and Threats The external environment is even more diverse and complex than the internal environment. There are many effective models to discuss, measure, and analyze the external environment (such as Porter’s Five Force, SWOT Analysis, PESTEL framework, etc.). For the sake of this discussion, we will focus on the following general strategic concerns as they pertain to opportunities and threats: • Markets (customers): Demographic and socio-cultural considerations, such as who the customers are and what they believe, are critical to capturing market share. Understanding the needs and preferences of the markets is essential to providing something that will have a demand.

• Competition: Knowing who else is competing and how they are strategically poised is also key to success. Consider the size, market share, branding strategy, quality, and strategy of all competitors to ensure a given organization can feasibly enter the market. • Technology: Technological trajectories are also highly relevant to success. Does the manufacturing process of the product have new technologies which are more efficient? Has a disruptive technology filled the need that was currently being filled? • Supplier markets: Suppliers have great power as they control the necessary inputs to an organization’s operational process.

For example, smartphones require rare earth materials; if these materials are increasingly scarce, the price points will rise. • Labor markets: Acquiring key talent and satisfying employees (relative to the competition) is critical to success. This requires an understanding of unions and labor laws in regions of operation. • The economy: Economic recessions and booms can change spending habits drastically, though not always as one might expect. While most industries suffer during recession, some industries thrive. It is important to know which economic factors are opportunities and which are threats.

• The regulatory environment: Environmental regulations, import/export tariffs, corporate taxes, and other regulatory concerns can poise high costs on an organization. Integrating this into a strategy ensures feasibility. While there are many other external considerations one could take into account during the strategic planning process, this list gives a good outline of what must be considered in order to minimize unexpected threats or missed opportunities. Strategic Analysis With both the internal value chain and external environment in mind, upper management can reasonably derive a set of strategic principles that internally leverage strengths while externally capturing opportunities to create profits—and hopefully advantages over the competition. CC licensed content, Specific attribution • Strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy.

Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • balanced scorecard. Provided by: Wikipedia.

License: • Strategic planning. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • strategy.

Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • strategic management. Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • Strategy map. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Strategic management. Provided by: Wikipedia.

License: • Business Strategy/Overview of Strategic Planning. Provided by: Wikibooks. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business Strategy. Provided by: Wikibooks. License: • mission statement.

Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • raison d'etre. Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • board of directors. Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • Strategy map.

Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Product Improvement Strategies. Provided by: Wikimedia.

License: • Break-even analysis. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia.

License: • Effectiveness. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • strategy. Provided by: Wiktionary.

License: • Boundless. Provided by: Boundless Learning. License: • Strategy map. Provided by: Wikimedia.

License: • Product Improvement Strategies. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • File:SWOT en.svg - Wikimedia Commons. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Survey of Communication Study/Chapter 11 - Organizational Communication. Provided by: Wikibooks.

License: • Strategic management. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Strategic management. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Strategic management. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Process management.

Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Business strategy. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • structured. Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • entrepreneurial. Provided by: Wiktionary.

License: • Structured interview. Provided by: Wikipedia. License: • Strategy map. Provided by: Wikimedia.

License: • Product Improvement Strategies. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • File:SWOT en.svg - Wikimedia Commons.

Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Strategy Map. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Business Strategy/Overview of Strategic Planning. Provided by: Wikibooks.

License: • Business Strategy/Overview of Strategic Planning. Provided by: Wikibooks. License: • Business Strategy/Overview of Strategic Planning. Provided by: Wikibooks.

License: • Boundless. Provided by: Boundless Learning. License: • assessment. Provided by: Wiktionary. License: • Strategy map. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Product Improvement Strategies.

Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • File:SWOT en.svg - Wikimedia Commons. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Strategy Map.

Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Competitive Forces. Provided by: Wikimedia. License: • Michael Porter.

Provided by: Wikipedia.

Strategic Planning Basics of Strategic Planning The objectives of strategic planning including understanding the benefits of strategic planning; understanding the products of strategic planning; and learning the keys to successful planning and implementation. Many organizations spend most of their time reacting to unexpected changes instead of anticipating and preparing for them. This is called crisis management. Organizations caught off guard may spend a great deal of time and energy 'playing catch up'.

They use up their energy coping with immediate problems with little energy left to anticipate and prepare for the next challenges. This vicious cycle locks many organizations into a reactive posture. It does not have to be that way. A sensible alternative is a well tested process called strategic planning which provides a viable alternative to crisis management.

Strategic planning is a step by step process with definite objectives and end products that can be implemented and evaluated. Very simply, it is a process by which we look into the future, paint a picture of that future based on current trends, and influence the forces that will affect us. Strategic planning looks three to five years ahead. It charts a definite course based on strong indicators of what the business environment will be like in those years.

Indicators include census demographic statistics, economic indicators, government policies, and technological advances. They reveal strong trends regarding changes in lifestyles and the economic and political climates, which are important factors influencing the facilities planning and management industry. Some of these trends are potential opportunities, some potential threats, and some are both.

Examining the possibilities and formulating strategies to meet the challenges can help the organization take full advantage of opportunities and minimize threats. In short, we can take control of the future. We can use our energies and resources more effectively and conduct our business more successfully, despite changes in the environment. Why Strategic Planning?

Besides the personal satisfaction of taking charge of the organizations future, strategic planning offers at least five compelling reasons for its use: • Forces a look into the future and therefore provides an opportunity to influence the future, or assume a proactive posture. • Provides better awareness of needs and of the facilities related issues and environment.

• Helps define the overall mission of the organization and focuses on the objectives. • Provides a sense of direction, continuity, and effective staffing and leadership. • Plugs everyone into the system and provides standards of accountability for people, programs, and allocated resources.

In summary, strategic planning is the key to helping us collectively and cooperatively gain control of the future and the destiny of our organization. Five Products of Strategic Planning The overall goal of strategic planning is to produce a workable plan. Along the way, we will develop, evaluate, and refine these five products: • Environmental issues and trends: Factors that may impact the organization and the way it conducts business. Internal issues include staff, services, skills, resources, and needs.

External factors include such things as threats of outsourcing. A strategic planning committee compiles an environmental scan, a body of information about the environment. Broad issues, singled out as potentially having significant effect on the facilities planning and management industry, are referred to as mega issues. • Needs Survey: Provides information from clients and peer institutions. The prioritized needs and expectations resulting from the survey are crucial as a basis for setting objectives.

• Mission Statement: Defines the organization's fundamental reason for existence and establishes the scope of its business. • General Objectives: Broadly describe the results of what the organization wants to achieve in light of needs and relevant issues. • Strategies: Specific, measurable actions and directions designed to reach the objectives established. Strategies are fulfilled through creation, continuation, change, or elimination of programs.

The mission statement, general objectives, and strategies are the meat of the plan. The issues and results of the needs survey are the input into the plan, and they provide the basic assumptions for developing a realistic and feasible plan. Keys to Successful Implementation Suppose our organization thoroughly develops all five products of strategic planning, completes the process, and comes up with a strategic plan. Everyone has the best intentions but when we get back to our units, we are overwhelmed with daily details. Soon it's 'business as usual,' the plan sits on the shelf, and before we know it, another year has passed. However, this need not happen. The three major keys to successful strategic planning and implementation are commitment, credibility, and communication.

Up-front commitment by the leaders must include an adherence to the full and thorough process of strategic planning. There must also be a commitment to implementing the strategies recommended by the strategic planning committee.

The leaders should implement programs and services and commit allocations to meet the objectives of the strategic plan at a level that is 'doable' for the organization and level of activity. As one person has put it, 'To commit to plan, is to commit to change.' A strategic planning committee researches, collects input, and makes recommendations. But, it is up to member of the organization to implement the recommendations. Credibility is created and maintained by following these three guidelines: representative participation, adherence to the complete process, and clear documentation. The strategic planning committee should have representatives from all areas of the organization and adhere to the steps of the process. While the actual logistics of research and implementing the plan can be tailored to the available resources, all five products should be carefully developed and evaluated.

The committee should document all of its research and activities to serve as the basis for the strategic plan and its background materials. It will also serve as a clear record of the committee's activities open for all to see and evaluate. Download Game Ultraman Fighting Evolution 3 Untuk Pc. There should be nothing exclusive or secret about strategic planning. It should be open to all for review and input. Input, feedback, and understanding are crucial at every step. A key concept to remember is that strategic planning is a cooperative and participatory process. Everyone should have input and, ideally, everyone should feel a sense of ownership over the final plan.

Such personal commitment will facilitate the implementation process. It is important to explain the principles and goals of strategic planning to everyone in the organization. We need to assure each person that although he or she may not be on the committee, everyone can have input and evaluate the recommendations. It is up to the staff and committees to determine how to fulfill each objective. The strategic planning committee makes general recommends on what they think should be done.

The leadership, operating committees, and staff determine how it will be done. An additional aid to implement the strategic plan is to create an integrated system by which the strategic plan becomes the 'benchmark' (measuring stick) for progress in our organization. It then becomes a system of accountability. The best way to set up an integrated system is for the directors to accept the strategic plan and make the mission statement part of the directives. The strategic plan can then become the context from which programs and services flow.

Strategic planning is the key to assuring that our organization is prepared for the challenges of tomorrow., Associate Vice President Facilities Planning & Management Iowa State University From, September 1998.